Effects of lavender on anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Donelli D, et al.
doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153099No marketing, no recycled abstracts. A short digest, an honest takeaway, and a link to the original paper. When trial design is weak we say so. When evidence is thin we say so. When the effect is real we say that too.
— 12 references currently linked to plant profiles. Each digest below traces back to at least one cited plant on the site.
Donelli D, et al.
doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2019.153099Mao JJ, et al.
doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2016.10.012Kasper S, et al.
EMA HMPC
Ngan A, Conduit R
doi:10.1002/ptr.3400Cases J, et al.
doi:10.1007/s12349-010-0045-4Taavoni S, Ekbatani N, Kashaniyan M
Amsterdam JD, et al.
Linde K, et al.
Shah SA, et al.
Henley DV, et al.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa064725Kennedy DO, et al.
— Five tiers, transparent weighting. The same paper always lands on the same rung — and we show you which rung on every claim.
Pooled data across many trials. Weighted highest when methodology is sound (Cochrane-grade).
Single RCTs, ideally double-blind and placebo-controlled. Sample size and replication matter.
Cohort studies, case series. Useful for signals, weak for causation.
EMA/HMPC monographs, national pharmacopoeias. Centuries of use, modern review.
Anthropological literature, herbarium notes. Lowest weight, but historically important context.
— The standing sources behind the PlantSage database. Each one we credit on the plant profiles that use its data.
Occasional email when substantial new content lands — plant profiles, seasonal growing notes, folk-remedy additions. Free, no tracking, unsubscribe anytime.